🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGet started →

Counter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - Super DraculaN Group A

Cross-platform snapshot for "Counter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - Super DraculaN Group A": deepest order book, lowest fee, geo-coverage at a glance.

Over 100% Under 0% Volume: $549K Liquidity: $850K Closes: 24 Jun 2026
Trade on Kalshi Alternative UK →
Counter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - Super DraculaN Group A

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Kalshi Alternative UK Pick
polygram.ink
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Open on Kalshi Alternative UK →
Polymarket
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Open on Kalshi Alternative UK →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Open on Kalshi Alternative UK →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Open on Kalshi Alternative UK →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Open on Kalshi Alternative UK →

Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on Kalshi Alternative UK.

Active sub-markets

O/U 2.5 Games100% Over0% Under
Map Handicap: EF (-1.5) vs AM Gaming (+1.5)0% Eternal Fire100% AM Gaming
Match Winner100% AM Gaming0% Eternal Fire
Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Eternal Fire (-3.5) vs AM Gaming (+3.5)0% Eternal Fire100% AM Gaming
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.50% Over100% Under
Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Eternal Fire (-3.5) vs AM Gaming (+3.5)100% Eternal Fire0% AM Gaming

Market context

The underlying event is the Counter-Strike 2 lower bracket quarterfinal match between AM Gaming and Eternal Fire, scheduled for 2:00 PM ET on 24 June 2026 in the Super DraculaN Group A. With crowd-implied probability at 100% for AM Gaming, the market treats an Eternal Fire victory as virtually impossible, a stance that diverges sharply across platforms: Polymarket users see decimal odds reflecting near-zero risk, whereas Kalshi traders face implied probability caps and stricter KYC requirements, while Betfair and Smarkets offer more fluid decimal pricing with lower fees but broader geographic access.

Historical head-to-head records frame this certainty; AM Gaming defeated Eternal Fire 2–0 in the NODWIN Clutch Series Season 4 in January 2026, and Eternal Fire lost 1–2 to A1 Gaming League in the same tournament cycle, suggesting a consistent performance gap [3][4]. However, Eternal Fire’s recent 2–0 semi-final loss to MOUZ in Blast Open Lisbon 2025 indicates vulnerability against top-tier opponents, yet their failure to replicate that form against AM Gaming remains the catalyst for the 100% pricing [1]. Traders should monitor official HLTLV match confirmations and any roster announcements from either team, as a delayed start beyond seven days would reset the market to 50–50, a contingency rarely priced in on Kalshi but more transparently displayed on Betfair’s decimal boards [7].

Recent news from EGamersWorld confirms Eternal Fire’s semi-final exit, reinforcing their current underperformance relative to AM Gaming’s dominance in regional qualifiers [1]. The key dependency is match completion; if the game begins but is not finished, the market resolves based on the winner determined, a nuance where Polymarket’s fee structure may disadvantage small traders compared to Smarkets’ zero-fee model for matched bets. No moralising is required: the facts show AM Gaming’s superiority, and the 100% probability reflects a market that has already priced in all known variables, leaving little room for arbitrage except on platforms with divergent fee or KYC policies.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page compares Counter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - Super DraculaN Group A specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. Live odds come from the Polymarket order book; the other venues' contract details are maintained manually because their APIs aren't directly comparable. Every CTA routes to Kalshi Alternative UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.

Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
On Kalshi Alternative UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
What does it cost to trade on Kalshi Alternative UK?
Zero. Kalshi Alternative UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.
How fast are USDC deposits?
Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
How reliable are the quoted odds?
The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
and

Trade Counter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - Su… on Kalshi Alternative UK

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Trade on Kalshi Alternative UK →