Market statistics
- Total volume
- $1.9M
- 24h volume
- $1.9M
- Liquidity
- $2.2M
- Open interest
- $851K
Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
0% | 100% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
0% | 100% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Available prediction outcomes (12)
Sorted by descending live probability. Click any outcome to trade it on PolyGram.
Market context
MOUZ, the Austrian-German esports organisation, face Argentina's 9z in a best-of-three Counter-Strike match during the PGL Astana Group Stage, scheduled for 11 May 2026 at 07:00 ET. The fixture forms part of a major international tournament, with both teams competing for progression and ranking points. The 0% implied probability across prediction markets suggests either extreme confidence in MOUZ's superiority or minimal trading volume at settlement, a pattern common in niche esports fixtures where liquidity concentrates on favoured outcomes.
Historical precedent matters here: MOUZ has consistently ranked within the top 10 globally in Counter-Strike 2, whilst 9z operates as a mid-tier regional competitor. When Kalshi and Polymarket have offered similar esports matchups, the probability gap between favourites and underdogs typically reflects a 15–25 percentage-point spread for comparable skill differentials. Smarkets and Betfair have historically shown tighter odds on regional upsets, suggesting traders on those platforms price in volatility and map-pool variance more generously. The current 0% reading likely reflects either a data lag or the market's treatment of 9z as statistically eliminated before play.
Traders should monitor official PGL announcements regarding roster changes, player availability, or schedule shifts. Recent Counter-Strike roster moves have occasionally altered match outcomes within 48 hours of fixture time. The settlement window's 7-day grace period for delayed matches creates arbitrage risk if the tournament experiences scheduling conflicts—a recurring issue at international LANs. Confirmation of final lineups and map selection typically emerges 24 hours pre-match.
Wikipedia Context
-
Counter-Strike: SourceCounter-Strike: Source is a tactical first-person shooter video game developed by Valve and Turtle Rock Studios. Released in October 2004 for Windows, it is a remake of Counter-Strike (2000) using the Source game engine. As in the original, Counter-Strike: Source pits a team of counter-terrorists against a team of terrorists in a series of rounds. Each round
Methodology
We read Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs 9z (BO3) - PGL Astana Group Stage from four platform perspectives: Polymarket (on-chain CLOB), Kalshi (CFTC-regulated exchange), Betfair Exchange (sports book exchange), Smarkets (peer-to-peer betting exchange). Polymarket's live mid is the canonical probability; the side-by-side columns benchmark fees, KYC, settlement currency and deposit rails so you can choose the venue that fits your jurisdiction and trade size.
Resolution & payout
Resolution source: This market settles from the official publication at https://www.twitch.tv/PGL. A proposer submits the result to the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon, the two-hour challenge window opens, and the smart contract pays out in USDC.
Polymarket settles via UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer posts the outcome with a bond, the two-hour window runs, then the smart contract pays USDC.
Kalshi settles USD through the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse — the cleanest variant, with heavier KYC. Betfair Exchange settles in account currency (GBP/EUR), net of 2-5% commission. Smarkets follows the same model as Betfair with a lower default 2% commission.
FAQ
- What does Polymarket cost vs Kalshi?
- Polymarket: 0% fees, only Polygon network costs (~$0.01/trade). Kalshi: up to 7% per trade plus spread. For high-frequency traders, Polymarket is dramatically cheaper.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- What about Smarkets as an alternative?
- Smarkets is a UK betting exchange with a lower default commission (2%) than Betfair. Liquidity on political markets is below Polymarket, comparable to Kalshi. Geo-blocked in many jurisdictions.
- Which platform is accessible globally?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Kalshi is US-only. Betfair and Smarkets are UK-restricted. PolyGram has a different geo footprint and routes to Polymarket's order book at 0% fees.
Trade Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs 9z (BO3) - PGL Astana Group … on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →