Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Kalshi Alternative UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
99% | 1% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Trade this market → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
99% | 1% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Trade this market → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Trade this market → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Trade this market → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Trade this market → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Spread -0.5 | 99% |
| Spread -1.5 | 99% |
| Spread -2.5 | 99% |
| Spread -3.5 | 99% |
| Spread -4.5 | 99% |
| Spread -5.5 | 99% |
| Spread -6.5 | 99% |
| Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 96% |
| Spread -14.5 | 94% |
| O/U 35.5 | 94% |
| O/U 37.5 | 93% |
| Spread -17.5 | 92% |
| O/U 39.5 | 90% |
| O/U 41.5 | 87% |
| O/U 43.5 | 86% |
| O/U 45.5 | 81% |
| O/U 47.5 | 77% |
| O/U 49.5 | 75% |
| O/U 51.5 | 67% |
| 1H O/U 27.5 | 63% |
| O/U 53.5 | 60% |
| 1H O/U 21.5 | 60% |
| 1H O/U 30.5 | 57% |
| Spread -20.5 | 56% |
| O/U 55.5 | 55% |
| Spread -7.5 | 51% |
| Spread -8.5 | 51% |
| Spread -10.5 | 51% |
| Spread -13.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 27.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 30.5 | 51% |
| 2H O/U 33.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 1Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| 2Q O/U 13.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 3Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| 4Q O/U 7.5 | 51% |
| 4Q O/U 13.5 | 51% |
| 4Q O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard O/U 26.5 | 51% |
| Howard O/U 32.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 51% |
| Howard 1H O/U 15.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 12.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 11.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 13.5 | 51% |
| Howard 2H O/U 15.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 12.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 2H O/U 16.5 | 51% |
| 2H Moneyline | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 51% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 51% |
| Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 51% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 51% |
| Howard 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 51% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 51% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 51% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 51% |
| Spread -20.5 | 50% |
| Spread -17.5 | 50% |
| Spread -16.5 | 50% |
| Spread -14.5 | 50% |
| Spread -13.5 | 50% |
| Spread -10.5 | 50% |
| Spread -8.5 | 50% |
| Spread -7.5 | 50% |
| Spread -6.5 | 50% |
| Spread -5.5 | 50% |
| Spread -4.5 | 50% |
| Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| Spread -2.5 | 50% |
| Spread -1.5 | 50% |
| Spread -0.5 | 50% |
| Spread -16.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 1H O/U 33.5 | 50% |
| 2H O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 1Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| 2Q O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| 3Q O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 10.5 | 50% |
| 4Q O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Howard O/U 29.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers O/U 35.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| Howard 1H O/U 13.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers 1H O/U 16.5 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 50% |
| Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 50% |
| Game Goes to Overtime | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 50% |
| Pick-Six Scored | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Howard Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 50% |
| Howard Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Howard Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 50% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 50% |
| O/U 57.5 | 49% |
| O/U 59.5 | 42% |
| O/U 61.5 | 38% |
| O/U 63.5 | 31% |
| O/U 65.5 | 26% |
| O/U 67.5 | 23% |
| O/U 69.5 | 18% |
| O/U 71.5 | 15% |
| O/U 73.5 | 11% |
| O/U 75.5 | 9% |
| Howard O/U 20.5 | 5% |
| Howard O/U 23.5 | 3% |
| Howard vs. Rutgers | 2% |
Market context
The Howard vs. Rutgers prediction market currently prices this outcome at 99% YES. In the upcoming college football game between Howard and Rutgers, scheduled for September 25 at 7:00PM ET: This market will resolve to "Howard" if Howard win the game. This market will resolve to "Rut…
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $153K.
Methodology
This page compares Howard vs. Rutgers specifically across Polymarket, Kalshi, Betfair Exchange and Smarkets. The live probability is the Polymarket mid; the comparison columns summarise each venue's fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to Kalshi Alternative UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement is the biggest difference between the four platforms: Polymarket on-chain in USDC (instant), Kalshi USD via CFTC (T+1), Betfair and Smarkets in local currency via bank withdrawal (T+1 to T+3). On-chain settlement clears in minutes — the fastest payout path of the four.
UK Frequently Asked Questions
- Polymarket vs Kalshi — which is better?
- Depends on your location. Kalshi is CFTC-regulated, US-only with full KYC. Polymarket is global, on-chain, no KYC up to $1,500. Polymarket has ~10x higher liquidity but higher regulatory risk.
- Which platform has the deepest liquidity?
- Polymarket — by a wide margin. Top markets reach $50-500M volume, Kalshi ~$200M cumulative, Betfair similar. Deeper liquidity means your trade moves the quote less.
- Is Betfair a Polymarket alternative?
- Only partially. Betfair Exchange is UK-focused with a sports-betting emphasis; they have politics markets but with thinner liquidity than Polymarket. Settlement in GBP/EUR, 2-5% commission on winnings.
- Polymarket vs Betfair Exchange: which is better for UK prediction trading?
- Betfair Exchange offers UKGC regulation, GBP settlement, and potentially tax-free winnings — but focuses on sports and politics only. Polymarket has deeper liquidity, 0% platform fee, global event coverage, and crypto/geopolitical markets Betfair doesn't offer. For UK traders: Betfair for regulated GBP sports markets; Polymarket for broader, global prediction events.
- Is Kalshi available in the UK?
- Kalshi is a US CFTC-regulated prediction exchange. UK residents can create accounts but must use USD and US payment methods. Kalshi's product range overlaps with Polymarket but with lower liquidity on most contracts. For UK traders, Polymarket typically offers better prices due to higher global volume.
Trade Howard vs. Rutgers on Kalshi Alternative UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →